Fujifilm Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2 R Review - Review 2022

Photographers who shoot with the Fujifilm mirrorless camera organization take a distinct choice to make when shopping for a brusk telephoto prime lens. The company sells ii versions of its 56mm prime—this Fujinon XF 56mm F1.ii R ($999.95) and the Fujinon XF 56mm F1.ii R APD ( at Amazon) . Information technology'due south not but the cost of press APD on the lens that carries a $500 premium—the apodization filter included in the pricier lens promises to smooth the defocused parts of an image for a more pleasing bokeh. Whether or not that's worth information technology to you lot is something yous have to decide for yourself—either lens is able to capture precipitous photos with a staggeringly shallow depth of field with ease. Only neither quite matches our Editors' Choice curt telephoto lens for the Fuji system, the longer Fujinon XF 90mm F2 R LM WR ($i,249.00 at Amazon) .

Blueprint
Like almost Fujinon lenses, the XF 56mm ($999.00 at Amazon)  has a premium feel; its metal barrel and physical apeture ring play a large function in that. It's a squat lens, measuring 2.7 by 2.nine inches (HD) with a 62mm front filter thread. Information technology'south a little heavy at 14.three ounces, but still balances well with most of Fujifilm's mirrorless photographic camera line. A reversible hood is included; non included is a neutral density filter, which is something y'all get wth the XF 56mm F1.2 R APD.

The aperture control ring sits at the base of the lens. It has a marker for its wide-open up f/ane.ii setting, likewise as total-cease markings from f/one.four through f/16, and an A (automated) position if you prefer to permit the camera control the f-stop. Aligning from f/1.4 through f/16 is possible in third-stop increments. Paradigm stabilization isn't included, but that'southward a rare feature in a lens of this type—the Zeiss Batis 85/1.viii ($1,199.00 at Amazon) , which covers an equivalent field of view when paired with Sony full-frame mirrorless cameras, does have it, just it'southward an exception.

The knurled transmission focus band occupies the bulk of the barrel. It'south finished in metal—a divergence from many lenses that feature rubberized focus rings. Transmission focus with the XF 56mm isn't the well-nigh pleasant aspect of use. The focus by wire design means that turning the ring activates the in-lens focus motor, rather than turning physical components. There's non much lag in response, which helps, simply the tactile feedback you get with a mechanical manual focus organization just isn't there. That'south non unique to Fujifilm—most lenses for mirrorless systems operate in the same manner. If you prefer transmission focus, tin e'er adapt an SLR lens to the body, or become for a mechanical lens that tin be used with X cameras sans adapter, like the Lensbaby Velvet 56 ($449.95 at Amazon) .

The APD version of the lens can operate using contrast discover autofocus only. But the standard XF 56mm can take advantage of the hybrid phase and contrast autofocus systems used by advanced models similar the X-T10 ($269.99 at Amazon) with which we tested the lens. Still, even with access to on-sensor phase detection, the XF 56mm is on the slower side to lock focus, requiring about 0.five-second to do and then if the shot is defocused to begin with, and 0.3-2nd to lock and fire if focus was already fairly shut to authentic.

I don't commonly dwell on bokeh in reviews, because its appeal is largely subjective and can vary greatly based on the groundwork and your subject's distance from said background. But others have compared the 56mm and the 56mm APD side by side, which confirms my thoughts on using the ii lenses about a year apart: The differences in grapheme are adequately subtle. I'g pretty happy with the fashion bokeh looks with the standard version of the lens, and I think I'd be hard-pressed to identify which version of the lens was used to capture images in a blind side by side comparison. But if you're a bokeh fiend, the 56mm APD does have a slightly smoother quality to its defocused backgrounds, though $500 is a steep premium to pay for that.

Image Quality
I used Imatest to check the sharpness of the XF 56mm when paired with the 16-megapixel X-T10. It delivers excellent paradigm particular, even at f/one.2, where it scores 2,227 lines per picture show tiptop on a center-weighted sharpness examination. The lens manages to maintain a loftier level of image quality right up to the edge of the frame, which lags just behind the heart in terms of crispness. That's a fiddling less than the 56mm APD netted, just it was tested on a different camera body, the X-T1 ($318.00 at Amazon) , and scores can be affected by sample variation, even when testing the same lens model.

Encounter How We Test Digital Cameras

At f/1.four and f/2 at that place is a slight drop in sharpness, but the XF 56mm still scores 2,098 lines and 2,200 lines respectively, both in excess of the 1,800 lines nosotros look for in an image. At f/2.8 the score jumps to ii,545 lines, and it continues to improve at f/4 (two,706 lines) and f/v.vi (two,820 lines), before peaking at f/eight (2,845 lines). There's a nominal drop at f/eleven (2,777 lines) and a more than noticeable dip at f/16 (2,486 lines) due to diffraction. Simply any way you slice information technology, the XF 56mm performs with aplomb.

I used an ExpoDisc to run into how evenly illuminated the frame is when the lens is shooting a uniformly greyness scene. It is an infrequent performer, showing only a 1.1EV drib in brightness at the corners of the frame at f/1.2—that'south barely noticeable in real-earth weather condition. At f/i.4 that drib is simply 0.8EV, and at narrower apertures it's negligible to the betoken where I'd say the lens illuminates scenes evenly from edge to border. Distortion is also a nonissue—at that place's none to speak of.

Conclusions
Fujifilm has no shortage of splendid lenses for its mirrorless photographic camera system. The Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2 R stands out from the crowd due to its maximum discontinuity—at that place's only 1 other autofocus mirrorless lens that that gathers this much lite. Some may exist drawn to the pricier APD version due to the palpable, albeit subtle, differences in the way it draws out of focus backgrounds—but the APD filter adds cost, slows focus, and cuts light-gathering past about half at its widest aperture. At the end of the day, it's a subjective decision every bit to which of the pair is the right lens for yous—I'd give slight preference to this one based on cost and its benefits when shooting in available light, but an equal argument tin can exist fabricated for the subtle character differences offered by the APD. As proficient every bit the 56mm and its sibling are, they don't quite earn Editors' Choice honors. Our favorite short telephoto prime for the Fuji X system is the XF 90mm F2 R LM WR. It has a longer focal length, which may be a turnoff for some who prefer the wider field of view offered by the 56mm, but it's also an incredible optical performer, faster to lock focus, and features a weatherproof blueprint.

Best Lens Picks

• The Best Fujifilm Lenses for 2022
• The All-time Leica Thou Lenses for 2022
• The All-time Micro Four Thirds Lenses for 2022
• The All-time Pentax SLR Lenses for 2022
• More than Lens Reviews
• More from Fujifilm

Further Reading

• Tamron Details Affordable seventy-180mm F2.8 Zoom Lens
• The Best Sony Mirrorless Lenses for 2022
• The Best Nikon Lenses for 2022
• The Best Canon Lenses for 2022
• Oops! $13K Camera Lens Sells for $95 Due to Prime Day Error

Source: https://sea.pcmag.com/cameras/10186/fujifilm-fujinon-xf-56mm-f12-r-review

Posted by: brownhatichoode.blogspot.com

Share this post